Reading time: 6 min
Monday morning, 9am. Marc, IT Director of a 200-person SME in Strasbourg, opens his financial dashboard with his coffee and his pretzel.
"What on earth is this?!" he exclaims.
The verdict: 47,000 euros spent on AI tools in the last 6 months.
ChatGPT Team: 12,000 euros
Claude Pro for 15 employees: 4,500 euros
Midjourney: 1,800 euros
Microsoft Copilot: 18,000 euros
Various AI licenses: 10,700 euros
"Good grief, this is NOT good at all!" Marc mutters, adjusting his glasses.
The problem? When he surveys his teams:
40% only use their subscription once a week - "They're basically just pretending to be busy!"
25% gave up after 2 months - "Wonderful, so we're paying for nothing!"
Nobody knows who uses what - "It's complete chaos!"
No sensitive data is secured - "Oh no, if the GDPR auditors see this..."
Teams switch from one tool to another based on personal preference - "Everyone just does whatever they want, apparently!"
Marc just discovered he belongs to the 90% of companies wasting their AI budget.
"Right, time to clean up this mess before the CFO has a meltdown!" he thinks, taking a big gulp of coffee.
Symptom: Each department has its own ChatGPT, Claude, Midjourney licenses... "Just like us!" Marc would say.
Actual cost for 10 people:
10 ChatGPT Business licenses = 3,625 euros/year (362.50 euros per user, excl. tax)
10 Claude Team licenses = 1,800 euros/year (15 euros/month/user)
10 Perplexity Pro licenses = 2,400 euros/year ($20/month)
Midjourney = 720 euros/year
Total: 8,545 euros/year for 10 people
Why it's wasteful:
You're paying multiple times for similar features
No visibility into who actually uses what
Impossible to pool API costs
Administrative overhead multiplied by the number of tools
What happens:
Marketing uses ChatGPT
Accounting uses Claude
HR uses Gemini
Sales discovered Perplexity
Result:
Zero consistency
Training costs multiplied by 4
Data scattered everywhere
Impossible to capitalize on learnings
Hidden cost: 200-400 hours/year of time lost on training and juggling between tools.
The terrifying reality:
An employee creates a personal ChatGPT or Claude account instead of using the company workspace. They copy-paste:
Technical specs for a new product
The list of strategic clients
Negotiation margins
Where does that data go? To American servers. Worse: by default, some tools enable model training on your data.
Real example: Previously, Claude's model training was disabled by default. Today, it's enabled by default and must be manually turned off. If your employees don't know this, your sensitive data is being used to improve AI models accessible to everyone.
Potential cost: A leak = millions of euros in damages + reputational harm.
Classic scenario:
January: "Let's try ChatGPT Team for the whole department!"
March: 60% adoption
June: 30% active usage
September: 15% regular users
But you're still paying for 100% of the licenses.
Real example: A 50-person company was paying 18,000 euros/year for 50 ChatGPT Business licenses. Actual usage? 12 active people. Waste: 13,680 euros/year.
Your teams waste time wondering:
"Should I use Claude or ChatGPT for this task?"
"Is Gemini better for data analysis?"
"Should I pay for Midjourney or try DALL-E?"
Time lost per employee: 30-45 min/week = 26-39 hours/year of evaporated productivity.
The problem: A user creates a personal account with their work email instead of logging into the company workspace.
The risks:
Account blocked for 30 days if the personal account is flagged
Paying for an unused license (the company pays for an empty seat)
Unsecured data (it doesn't go through the IT-controlled workspace)
The problem: Some tools display prices including tax while others show pre-tax prices. Additionally, some bill in dollars, others in euros.
Concrete example:
ChatGPT Business: 25 euros/month/user displayed -> Actually 30 euros incl. tax with VAT
Perplexity Pro: $20/month -> With EUR/USD fluctuation, you may pay 22-24 euros/month
Consequence: You budget 10,000 euros, you pay 12,000 euros. A 20% forecasting error.
The problem: Each tool has numerous settings across admin and individual accounts, and they change frequently.
Examples of critical settings:
Connectors: Box, Outlook Calendar, Canva, Codex for Slack, Dropbox... If misconfigured, data leaks
Model training: Enabled by default on some tools -> Your data improves public AI models
Workspace discovery: If disabled on ChatGPT, all company users (even without a license) can see and join the workspace
Custom GPT access: Should be set according to teams and permissions
Risk: Data leaks, performance loss, GDPR non-compliance.
The problem: When an employee leaves the company, changes teams, or a new hire arrives, a license often needs to be reassigned or transferred.
Risks:
No tracking of reassignments -> Duplicates or unused licenses
Data loss if the transfer isn't done before account deletion
Unclear onboarding/offboarding process -> License management in a manual spreadsheet
The problem: We used to discover a new feature every six months... now it's almost every week. Tools evolve rapidly and require regular monitoring to avoid falling behind.
Risks:
Automatic activation of new features without consent
Loss of compliance if new terms of service aren't followed
Monthly monitoring needed + informing employees
The ChatGPT problem: If workspace discovery isn't disabled, all company users (even those without a license) can see and join the workspace.
Consequence: Unauthorized access to custom GPTs and shared data.
The problem: Once licenses are deployed, employees have numerous questions about tool features or problems they encounter.
Risks:
Overwhelmed support with a growing volume of questions
Poor tool adoption
Lost productivity for teams that have to field questions
"Right, so now what do we do?" asks our IT Director after identifying all these problems.
Before:
Marketing -> ChatGPT (300 euros/month) Dev -> Claude (200 euros/month) Design -> Midjourney (60 euros/month) = 560 euros/month x 12 = 6,720 euros/year
After with a single platform like Sp0ton:
All models accessible from one interface Pooled pricing -> 250-400 euros/month = 3,000-4,800 euros/year
Savings: 1,920-3,720 euros/year (28-55% reduction)
Smart companies mandate:
Hosting in Europe (native GDPR compliance)
End-to-end encrypted data
No model training on their data
Full traceability of all queries
Instead of giving raw ChatGPT to everyone:
Customized studios per department (HR, Accounting, Marketing...)
Pre-configured prompts tailored to each business function
Centralized history for knowledge building
Analytics to optimize usage
Advantages:
All AI models (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Flux, Veo...) in one place
European data sovereignty
Custom business studios
30-60% cost reduction
Simplified access and license management
For whom? Companies that want to maintain internal control while simplifying management.
Advantages:
Complete management by experts (5,000+ licenses managed)
Billing in euros, exchange rates included
License activation tracking
Email support hotline available
License optimization strategy based on actual usage
Team usage reports
Active monitoring of licenses and options
For whom? Companies that want to focus on their core business and delegate 100% of AI administrative management to specialists.
Learn more about Reboot Conseil ->
List ALL your AI subscriptions:
Who pays for what?
Who actually uses them?
What's the total cost?
Free tool: Request your bank statements for the past 6 months and highlight all recurring AI payments.
Group your use cases:
Text generation -> Claude/GPT
Document analysis -> Claude
Image generation -> Flux/Midjourney
Code -> Claude/GPT-4
Goal: Go from 5 tools down to 1 platform (or delegate management entirely).
Enforce the rules:
No copying-pasting sensitive data into public AI tools
Mandatory use of a secured platform
Team training on best practices
Track your KPIs:
Cost per active user
ROI per department
Adoption rate
Realized savings
Every month that passes = money wasted. If you're spending 5,000 euros/month on poorly optimized AI tools, you're losing 30,000 euros over 6 months.
Adding yet another tool makes the problem worse. What you need is to consolidate, not stack.
ChatGPT is excellent, but:
Not the best for code (Claude is often superior)
Not the best for long-form analysis (Claude 200k tokens)
Not sovereign (your data goes to the US)
Not customizable by business function
Check the boxes that apply to you:
If you checked 2+ boxes: you're in the 90%.
List all your AI subscriptions (30 min)
Calculate the total monthly cost (15 min)
Identify unused licenses (1 hour)
Try Sp0ton or contact Reboot Conseil (20-min demo)
Compare the ROI (centralization vs. multi-tool vs. delegation)
Decide: consolidate or keep wasting
Remember Marc, the IT Director from the beginning? He made his decision.
"Right, I'm delegating all of this to Reboot Conseil. I've got other things to do than manage licenses by hand. And that way, the CFO will be happy when he sees the savings!"
Results after 3 months:
AI budget: -62%
Internal adoption: +145%
Security incidents: 0
Productivity: +40%
Admin management time: -95%
He joined the 10%.
What about you?
Option 1: Sp0ton Platform (soon available to the public) -> Discover the all-in-one solution
Option 2: Reboot Conseil Delegation -> Free audit + full management
P.S.: Did this article open your eyes? Share it with your IT Director, your CFO, your CEO. They'll thank you.
Sp0ton | 10 rue de Leicester, Strasbourg | AI Orchestration Platform
Fondateur et capitaine des Sociétés Reboot Conseil & Lamalo, Yaniv donne le cap depuis Strasbourg avec une vision claire : bâtir un cabinet de conseil IT, IA & Cyber - où autogouvernance, transparence et ambition ne sont pas que des mots. Diplômé de l'Université Paris Cité, il mêle leadership et passion tech au quotidien.
LinkedInGet our best articles every month.
Père Castor, raconte-moi N8N N8N (prononcez « n-huit-n » ou « nodemation » si vous voulez faire classe). C'est un outil qui permet de connecter vos...
ArticleL'intelligence artificielle s'est invitée dans le quotidien des marketeurs à une vitesse record. En quelques mois, des outils comme ChatGPT,...
ArticleLe risque ? Créer une \"illusion de compétence\" tout en laissant les véritables lacunes stratégiques se creuser. La solution est pourtant simple et...
ArticleÀ lire avec la voix de Stallone : « plus de puces, plus de data, plus de milliards, le maître du monde ». Je viens de regarder le dernier numéro du...
ArticleSoyons clairs : si vous dirigez une organisation de taille significative aujourd'hui, la complexité des données—leur volume, leur vitesse de...
ArticleOn parle ici d'une transformation fondamentale, un changement de paradigme comparable à l'arrivée d'Internet ou de l'électricité dans l'industrie....